Skip to main content

"Library Spokescritters" Social Media Success Stories

Previously, we discussed how libraries could use "spokescritters" (i.e., resident animals) to promote their services and collections.  Many of these "spokescritters" have taken to social media as their primary promotional vehicles.  How successful have they been?

Consider Mooresville (Indiana) Public Library's feline roving reporter, Cauli Le Chat.  Her blog, Cat's Eye View @ MPL, has been viewed extensively--as of right now, it has 475,341 viewings.  We saw this graphic from yesterday's blog posting:

Total Blog Viewings (as of February 24, 2018)
Cat's Eye View @ MPL

Mooresville Public Library (MPL) serves Brown Township in Morgan County, Indiana, which has a population under 15,000.  Furthermore, Cauli Le Chat officially "retired" as roving reporter early last year, because she doesn't get out as much as she used to (she once lived down the street and would hangout outside the library--hence her "roving reporter" status), and also because her "minions" who typed her blog had been shifted to other various job responsibilities that left less time for blogging.  Despite this, Cauli's blog still outperforms MPL's active Facebook and Twitter feeds, lagging behind only MPL's YouTube Channel, whose videos have over 1.2 million views (ranking second in the country among public libraries, behind the New York Public Library).  Compare Cauli's success to MPL's second most-read blog, which showcases local history and has, as of now, 152,000 views.

Thorntown (Indiana) Public Library (TPL) has had two resident felines, Tober and Chance, whose blog has been viewed, as of today, 233,173 times.  Thorntown has a population of 1,520 (as of the 2010 U.S. census).

Why have Cauli Le Chat and Tober/Chance become so popular?

  • Quantity and Variety of Posts:  Since Cauli Le Chat began her blog in December, 2010, she has authored over 1,300 articles on a wide range of subjects, most of which directly feature the library and its resources.  The more you write, the more chances people will read something.
  • Humor:  Cauli Le Chat and Tober/Chance try to make their blogs fun to read.  Their "catitude" mixes sarcasm with a uniquely feline intolerance for human foibles.  Cat lovers "get" them instantly.  Others appreciate how they gently poke fun at their colleagues (or things generally).  Readers enjoy having a good laugh or at least a grin or chuckle.
  • Cuteness:  Library animals are simply cute, so those actually living inside libraries (like Tober did, and Chance does now) are huge patron magnets.  People visit libraries just to see the resident pets.  This factor is less apparent at MPL, since Cauli Le Chat doesn't actually live there.
  • Worldwide Audience:  Both Cauli Le Chat's and Tober/Chance's blogs have garnered readers from around the world.  A global audience seriously boosts their statistics.
Does it really matter that these cat blogs have a global footprint?  Most of these readers will never visit MPL's or TPL's buildings.  But door counts alone don't fully explain a library's influence.  Librarians track statistics to show patron resource usage.  If a quarter million or half million people are reading about these library mascots, those readers count as patrons using library resources.  The blogs provide information about, and promote, their respective public libraries, which is no different than any other library social media.  If the Facebook "reach" or Twitter "impressions" are worthy of note in librarians' reports, then so is blog viewership.

Many, many libraries use "spokescritters" as public relations tools.  As MPL and TPL have demonstrated, "spokescritters" can register enormous payoffs in terms of patron interest in what these libraries offer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Challenges Due to Social Media Exposure

I work at Mooresville (Indiana) Public Library, and we occasionally receive challenges to items in our collections (usually books) that some patrons consider offensive, unfair, or contrary to their particular religious or value system.  Most of these challenges come verbally from irate patrons complaining to the circulation desk staff.  The library provides a written form in which patrons may explain their objections to specific items and their reasons, but, not surprisingly, many people don't want to commit their attacks to writing.  It's much easier to simply bellow at library staff and demand that the "undesirable" materials be removed "immediately."
We insist that the form be completed before an independent committee will review any complaints.  When patrons fill-out the form, they often cannot identify passages or page numbers upon which the offending words or ideas were presented.  That, of course, if because many people who challenge books and wish to…

Using Video to Promote ALA Banned Books Week

When promoting ALA Banned BooksWeek (BBW), most librarians have probably turned to the ol' reliable book display, like so:

Click images to enlarge

Book displays are great.  They centralize selected items, focus patrons' attention on a particular topic or theme, and they're relatively easy and inexpensive to produce.  But they're just so, well, static.  Stuff just sits there until patrons come along.
Another popular static medium we use to promote BBW is the customized book mark.

These take a bit more work but are fine as promotional tools, as far as they go.
How about something more, say, techno-savvy?


2018 Banned Books Week Promo Trailer by Mooresville (Indiana) Public Library

2016 Banned Books Week Promo Trailer by Mooresville (Indiana) Public Library

Since 2010 my library has used videos to promote BBW.  There are the promo trailer variety (above) that help stimulate interest, and these are reasonably effective (some of ours have been viewed thousands of times).  Book trailer…